"Wild Berry"

Campaign of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Unmanned Systems Forces against logistics hubs of the Wildberries marketplace in the russian rear — warehouses and distribution centers involved in enemy military logistics. Named the "twin sister" of the maritime "MoLoChKa": one campaign strikes the shadow fleet at sea, the other — logistics warehouses on land.

In July 2026, as part of the "Wild Berry" campaign (strikes on Wildberries logistics hubs in rf rear), 13 hits on 8 hubs were claimed. On August 2, 2026, the USF Commander reported the tenth successful strike of the campaign — on the Samara hub "Novosemeykino", described as "the main logistics bridge between the European part of rf and Siberia".

Sources: Telegram @robert_magyar · Telegram @robert_magyar

Sources: Telegram @robert_magyar, 18.07

The goal is stated directly: not financial losses per se (100 billion is a deliberate figure for comparison, not claimed damage), but rupturing the illusion of comfortable rear-area life for the population of the aggressor country. Wildberries is not a military object in the classic sense, but a civilian logistics node that the Commander openly names as a target precisely for this dual function: a supply channel and a symbol of domestic well-being simultaneously.

The Commander's channel directly calls "Wild Berry" the "twin sister" of the naval "MoLOChKa": the same doctrine applied to a different type of target — not shadow fleet vessels at sea, but logistics hubs on land. Both campaigns were announced by the same author on the same day, as part of a single pressure system, not a series of separate strikes.

Sources: Telegram @robert_magyar, 04.08

The campaign unfolds without a public daily scale (unlike "MoLOChKa") — the dated markers below are four public statements by the USF Commander, each with a source link.

Leningrad Oblast

Sources: Telegram @robert_magyar, 30.07 · Telegram @robert_magyar, 02.08

Open "MoLOChKa"

Two different counts, not one. The list of nine named targets (30.07.2026) and the numbered count of "effective hooks" (where Novosimeykino is the tenth) — these are not the same scale. The channel has not published a complete numbered list from the 1st to the 10th hook with each named point tied to a specific number. The Simferopol hub is explicitly excluded by the channel from the numbering of effective hooks ("not counting the smaller Simferopol one retired earlier"), though it is mentioned in the list of targets. This page reproduces both statements separately and does not draw a connection between them that does not exist in the primary source.

Hub names, regions, and "retired" status — as named by the channel itself; this study did not conduct independent mapping or satellite confirmation of object coordinates. No other Defense Forces structure has published its own count for this campaign — the data does not cross-reference or mix with any other source.